Moreover, Martin Luther King Jr meticulously chooses specific words that carry with them a negative connotation that helps associate the Vietnamese war with injustice. (2022, May 4). Comparing the Justice System during the 1960s to a corrupt bank allows the audience to connect to what Dr. King is saying. Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King's "Beyond | Bartleby Dr. Kings purpose is to make the church leaders he is speaking to aware that the time has come for them to speak out loudly in opposition of the war in Vietnam. A comment like this doesnt leave the reader unmoved. We Will Write a Custom Case Study SpecificallyFor You For Only $13.90/page! The rhetoric helps prove how the poor lived worse in the. In this way, he personifies war as a demon that consumes people's lives and a nation's valuable resources which would otherwise be happy if it was not being ruined by bombs and bullets. On April 4, 1967, King addressed a crowd of 3,000 in Riverside Church by delivering a speech titled, "Beyond Vietnam," in the midst of the cruelty of the Vietnam War. Martin Luther King Jr., Malcom X, and Stokely Carmichael all had quite famous speeches that took a stance on racial inequality. Dr. King says that the war is draining valuable resources that could be helping the poor in our own country. Issues have been resolved because now the draft is less common because more people volunteer for war so the poor are not forced. In Martin Luther King Jr's passionate speech about America's involvement in Vietnam, he manages to create a strong and compelling argument that America's involvement in unjust . More importantly, King states that, the poor has been manipulated into believing a type of reality that simply isnt accurate or fair on their part. His audience at Riverside Church, likely familiar with his Civil Rights work, would most likely than view him with more credibility because they too could sympathize to an injustice done by the American government. He does not want the church leaders to simply listen to his message. King successfully brings out the irony behind the war through the use of figurative speech and plenty of imagery to paint a picture of destruction and doom in Vietnam. By repeating the phrase, "for the sake," he creates a rhythmic flow that causes his audience to be more receptive to his idea. King makes the nation appears as hypocrites because Americans pretend to fight as a united nation whereas segregation is among the same schools, the same neighborhood, the same country. The most famous speeches in the United States history all have utilized rhetoric devices and strategies. Martin Luther King Jr. applies imagery throughout his speech in order to illustrate the horrors of the war to arouse anger at its atrocities and injustice. War was an inhuman and barbaric exercise and America's participation was not in human interest. He also reminds the church leaders of something seemingly obvious that they may have lost sight of: the Father is deeply concerned especially for his suffering and helpless and outcast children (13). The Speech "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence" by Martin Luther In this way, he appeals to the emotions of the audience and challenges the logic behind an unnecessary war. If you have a suggestion about this website or are experiencing a problem with it, or if you need to report abuse on the site, please let us know. assume youre on board with our, Martin Luther King Jr. vs. President Obama, https://graduateway.com/rhetorical-analysis-of-martin-luther-kings-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence/. His efforts to consolidate and harmonise the US into one country for all is reflected in many of his writings and speeches spanning his career. All of the valid arguments and vivid imagery Dr. King uses combine to make this a very effective, passionate and memorable speech. He evaluates the psychological as well as social, political and economic implications of America's participation in Vietnam war. Favorite Quote:"Faith is taking another step without seeing the entire staircase.". In addition, his use of parallelism allows him to appeal to his audiences pity for the oppressed in order for him to express his call to action, a call for activism that goes beyond Vietnam. Moreover, Martin Luther King Jr meticulously chooses specific words that carry with them a negative connotation that helps associate the Vietnamese war with injustice. Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr eventually also gained momentum in the anti-war movement against the war in Vietnam. It allows them to imagine what might happen if America were to keep fighting in the war. When he argues that the war's immoral nature should be "incandescently clear," he implies to his audience that those who do not voice their opinion against the war are not concerned for, "the integrity and life of America.". He wants them to go back to their churches and spread the message. He also affirms that people have better options and that the idea of war, despite that it sounds patriotic is basically inhuman. This use of repetitive language conveys urgency and shows that he deeply believes the churches may influence the government if they speak against the war. The fact that young black men are being sent [across the world] to fight for the liberties in Southeast Asia, which they [have] not found in Georgia and East Harlem questions the validity of Americas founding principles of the unalienable rights of every individual; life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Likewise, during this time period, America [put little effort into] rehabilitation of its poor creating an even harder life for them (Source A). If it is, let us trace its movements and pray that our own inner being may be sensitive to its guidance, for we are deeply in need of a new way beyond the darkness that seems so close around us. If you have a suggestion about this website or are experiencing a problem with it, or if you need to report abuse on the site, please let us know. He efficiently uses the anecdote to tell how he has spoken with young men, telling them how violence will not solve their problems. He applies ethos to establish credibility, pathos to appeal to emotions, and logos to support his claims with hard evidence. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best His use of diction and imagery arouses anger while increasing his credibility since he criticizes the unjust war he describes. For example, in paragraph 7, King discusses the harsh reality of the war. This part of the speech is evoking violent images of death that would affect the emotions of the audience. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam A Time To Break Silence In the speech "Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence," by Martin Luther King Jr. he expresses his opinion on how the Vietnam war is unjust. King is effectively able to convey his point about his topic by using rhetorical devices such as logos, ethos, pathos. He states, repeatedly, To begin, King uses figurative language in the first half of his speech to highlight the destructive nature of the war, strengthening his overall position. In multiple paragraphs of his speech, King effectively appeals to emotion by using personal anecdotes that involve him speaking to people of poverty directly. All of Dr. Kings arguments are very effective. The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis. Hence, Kings works always had the recurring theme of the unity and strength of combined willpower. In his argument, King mounts a multi-pronged attack on America's participation in the Vietnam war and also gains people's sympathy for the Vietnamese. Acting almost as a climax, King lyrically urges his audience to voice their opinions and wage a war against this unjustified war in Vietnam. As a civil right mover he gave this great speech to all Americans (black and white) so that he could give off the idea of equality on the same level. Favorite Quote:Life is like a box of cheese and flower petal sometimes it's soft and sweet, sometimes it just plain stinks. "The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis." It is why while he attacks America's intervention in Vietnam on the one hand, on the other he brings people's attention towards the other side of life where America can become a beacon of hope and peace for the entire world including Vietnam. By continuing well assume you board with our, Rhetorical Analysis on Kennedy Steel Speech, Rhetorical Analysis of The Mexican-American and the Chruch Speech, Analysis of Dr. Martin Luther Kings I Have a Dream Speech, Rhetorical Devices in Bill Clintons Speech at the Democratic Convention, Speech Analysis: Speech in the Virginia Convention, How to secure financing as a small business owner, How to Make a Business Plan for Any Business, 7 Crucial Macro Environment Factors to Include in Your Analysis, Macro Environment Examples in the Real World. Is Hydrogen Fuel Efficient Enough to Replace Fossil Fuels in the Near Future. (2016, Nov 14). Likewise, the image of men, both black and while, "in brutal solidarity burning the huts of a poor village," helps establish the war in Vietnam as a complete disaster and atrocity. Apart from the use of ethos, pathos and logos in his speech, he builds a rock solid argument by involving religious figures and facts from history and philosophy. He quotes Langston Hughes, in his speech to establish a connection between the struggle for civil liberty in United States and the oppression in Vietnam. Beyond Vietnam -- A Time to Break Silence - American Rhetoric His first reasons are all about practicality. Thomas 1 Javon Thomas Mrs. Yelton English 1301 - Period 4 14 September 2018 Beyond Vietnam Rhetorical Analysis Essay In Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech, Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence, King discusses his views on America's involvement in the Vietnam War. Many people believed that America had no reason to interfere, Dr. King being one of those people. In Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech "Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence", delivered at Riverside Church in New York City on April 4, 1967, he claims that the American involvement in the Vietnam War is unjust. A few lines after, King writes about the injustice the African-American community has faced, by stating, We were taking the black young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem. To further show to the audience how his community has been suffering from the war, he uses a comparison statement between the facts to illustrate how freedom has been hard to attain. Graduateway.com is owned and operated by Radioplus Experts Ltd Titled as the I Have a Dream Speech, he read this speech to the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. Not to mention, many young people protested because they were the ones being drafted while others were against the war because the anti-war movement grew increasingly popular among the counterculture and drug culture in American society and. To help his audience see that Vietnam is only madness, a wastage of resources and an ignorance of more pressing concerns, King once again affirms that war was never a means of peace. It is clear that he wants the audience of church leaders to go back to their churches and fearlessly speak out in opposition of the war. Furthermore, when these stylistic elements are concluded with his use of parallelism, King effectively establishes America's involvement in the Vietnam War as unjust. He does this by appealing to certain issues the public see as important, using irony, and using diction and tone in persuasive ways. At last the paper discusses and assesses how to what an extent Kings dream came true with self-elected sources as backrest for the asses. Because of his crowd of mix races King made sure to make his speech imploring to all no matter what the race that they may be. In the speech, Martin Luther King specifically indicates that America needs to end the war with Vietnam. May 4, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/. Overall, Martin Luther King Jr. eloquently argues against the United States involvement in Vietnam through his use of parallelism, diction, and imagery. 4 May. StudyCorgi. Kings main motive was to persuade people to see how war was destroying lives, society and economy and being silent meant being in approval of the war. These two techniques played a crucial role in furthering his purpose and in provoking a powerful response from the audience that made this speech memorable and awe-inspiring. He successfully proves that The United States has done far more harm to the Vietnamese than good. He does it to engage peoples imagination and to awaken their consciences. However, he wishes that they would have lived up to his respect, and continues to hope that they will do so in the future. They wander into the towns and see thousands of the children, homeless, without clothes, running in packs on the streets like animals (20). This is an obvious and extremely effective argument, especially among a group of Christian church leaders. His speech emphasizes at transitioning from war to peace and from violence to a nonviolent and peaceful society. Along with, and the almost facile connection between the war in Vietnam, First, Martin Luther King Jr. uses emotional appeals to persuade his audience that the Vietnam War is unjust because it is unfairly killing the poor and its destroying the country. However, a very powerful speech, in manys opinion, is the Ive Been to the Mountaintop speech, given shortly before Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated. This quote causes the audience to realize the contradiction in the Vietnam war policy, making them less likely to accept. He says, And we must rejoice as well, for surely this is the first time in our nation's history that a significant number of its religious leaders have chosen to move beyond the prophesying of smooth patriotism to the high grounds of a firm dissent based upon the mandates of conscience and the reading of history. By repeating the phrase, for the sake, he creates a rhythmic flow that causes his audience to be more receptive to his idea. Here, Martin Luther King Jr is getting the audience emotionally and completely invested by showing the effect of America in Vietnam on their lives. There were many reasons why so many Americans were against the war. King is effectively able to convey his point about his topic by using rhetorical devices such as logos, ethos, pathos. While his I Have a Dream speech is considered his best one, his other speeches too offer a glimpse of his powerful rhetoric and his art of persuasion. There is at the outset a very obvious and almost facile connection between the war in Vietnam and the struggle I, and others, have been waging in America. The irony is explicit in Kings words that the war is just an attempt to cover and hide the more pressing issues before America. His use of imagery and diction is aimed at making people break their silence and express their anger clearly. Finally, Martin Luther King Jr. uses parallelism within his own reflection to evoke emotions in his audience to show that . (21). In his speech, Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence Martin Luther King Jr., uses appeals to emotion, appeals to credibility, and powerful diction to strengthen his argument and persuade his audience that the Vietnam War is unjust. Martin Luther King Jr is an African American preacher and civil rights activist that along with every other African American male and female in 1976 was waging a war in America for their not-so-natural born rights. While his words clearly deliver his disappointment over the path American government had chosen, it also expresses a clear intention to not be with the wrong and instead listen to ones inner voice. He shows a strong theme of determination, along with dedication, and perseverance. King uses quotes as these to suggest to convince them of the destruction of the Vietnam War, with pathos, by strongly appealing to his audience's emotion. The audience now feel as though this is very important because it has to do with regular poor people and t effects them as well. At the heart of their concerns, this query has often loomed large and loud: Why are you speaking about the war, Dr. King? Why are you joining the voices of dissent?(King). The war according to King Jr. is nothing more than a political game played for the sake of fun and ego. Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam" December 22, 2016 By Richcoca PLATINUM, Canoga Park, California More by this author Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement,. The third section is King's call for change. Kings letter is a response to those in the church who have critizied him, Yet, instead of apologizing, he stands strong for his cause and turns it around on them stating his own critisim. Despite criticism from speaking out about things other than civil rights, King uses syntax, rhetorical strategies, and appeals to . Rhetorical Analysis In King's Beyond Vietnam. When he argues that the wars immoral nature should be incandescently clear, he implies to his audience that those who do not voice their opinion against the war are not concerned for, the integrity and life of America. Finally, Martin Luther King Jr. uses parallelism within his own reflection to evoke emotions in his audience to show that . Rhetorical Analysis Of Mlk's Beyond Vietnam - 419 Words | Cram Artifact One: Beyond Vietnam: A Rhetorical Analysis to help you write a unique paper. Right at the outset, King involves religious figures to establish the credibility for his reason and to prove that war was improper and inhuman. His masterful delivery of these metaphors and the frequent repetition makes the speech much like a poem or a part of a song. We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. A Time to do What is Right. Pathos is a method applied to represent an appeal to feelings and emotions in a speech and other various kinds of writing. As a leader of his people, King took the stand to take radical measures to overcome the false promises of the sovereign government that had been addressing the issues of racial segregation through unimplemented transparent laws that did nothing to change the grim realities of the society. The speech deemed racial segregation to be an inhumane practice that subdivides society into groups that essentially alienate them from the true sense of humanity; which is brotherhood. Moreover, this set of diction allows King to logically state that he can not continue to fight on behalf of the oppressed if he himself doesn't address their oppressor, the U.S. government. Thomas 1 Javon Thomas Mrs. Yelton English 1301 - Period 4 14 September 2018 Beyond Vietnam Rhetorical Analysis Essay In Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech, Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence, King discusses his opinion on America's involvement in the Vietnam War. He uses metaphorical imagery, powerful diction,and symbolism to create an impact on the audience. He offers many practical reasons for the opposition, as well as spiritual and moral reasons. Since the founding of the Americas in the late 1400s, slavery was a problem; until the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation in 1862. A lot of parts from Martin Luther Kings dream have come true, but it is still not all that is how King wanted it to be. Likewise, during this time period, America [put little effort into] rehabilitation of its poor creating an even harder life for them (Source A). It also describes the Jim Crow laws and the busboy cot from 1955. Just like the people of America, the Vietnamese also have a right to live free on the lands of their fathers. Dr. King says, Even when pressed by the demands of inner truth, men do not easily assume the task of opposing their governments policy, especially in time of war (3). Dream like you will live forever, live like you will die today. His main purpose was to try to persuade the audience to . For instance, he does when he depicts the, "Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools." Issues have been resolved because now the draft is less common because more people volunteer for war so the poor are not forced. Martin Luther King Jr proves to all throughout his speech "Beyond Vietnam --- A Time to Break Silence" that the Vietnam war was unjust by his use of emotional diction, the allusion of Jim crow, and repetition. He uses the word 'We', connecting with the audience and ensuring them that together they will bring change to social conditions and attitudes. 663 Words; Copyright 2023 IPL.org All rights reserved. However, his speech is not filled entirely with only emotionally charged words and phrases or just with pictures of war and destruction or poverty. Let us not wallow in the valley of despair. (King). Introduction Martin Luther King, Jr in his speech "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence" argued that US foreign policy was hypocritical when compared to the inequality present in the United States. Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam", Key Ingredients to Being a Successful Student. He proves that the government has been manipulating the poor when he writes, It was sending. It permits Dr. King to enlighten people of what was going in that time period. Furthermore, when these stylistic elements are concluded with his use of parallelism, King effectively establishes Americas involvement in the Vietnam War as unjust. Martin Luther King Jr proves to all throughout his speech Beyond Vietnam --- A Time to Break Silence that the Vietnam war was unjust by his use of emotional diction, the allusion of Jim crow, and repetition. He also says the war is further crippling the poor in the United States by sending a disproportional number of them to the front lines to die. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam By Martin Luther King He is using vivid language to describe the casualties; however, they are also supported by evidence, as he is using precise numbers in this part of the speech. The American intervention came at a time when the Vietnamese were expecting freedom and peaceful life and it came in a manner that was even devastating compared to the French occupation. He expresses his anguish at seeing people of Vietnam and America suffer and also notes that if American folks do not break their silence they stand to lose much more than their opponents. These statements serve to communicate to the audience that the speaker is someone of authority and should be listened to. Rhetorical Devices In Beyond Vietnam Speech 736 Words3 Pages All they wanted was "to save the soul of America" (King, Beyond, 42). King was establishing his point that America was more troubled about healing and adjusting other countries, but would never invest the same in their own country. It also uses a bit of strong imagery. King demonstates this by saying, In deep disappointment, I have wept over the laxity of the church. You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly. And, to argue that King 's most radical days were never fulfilled; that his next campaign was to confront the president over the Vietnam War and economic disparity, a direct confrontation with a president over an immoral war state Hill and Wang from the book review. Analyzes how john kerry's "beyond vietnam- a time to break silence" by martin luther king jr. uses rhetorical devices that emphasize the importance and meaning of his speech. Welcome to the world of case studies that can bring you high grades! During this time period there was a lot of controversy surrounding the war. For instance, he starts by stating the effects of the Vietnam War forced the American poverty program: "experiments, hopes, new beginnings." Favorite Quote:What doesn't kill you only makes you stronger. Society's punishments are small wounds compared to the wounds we inflict on our soul when we look the other way." Many of us have felt the anxiety to speak up against what we know is wrong.

Defunct Minor League Baseball Teams 2021, Beyond Van Gogh Vip Merchandise Package, Articles B

Share

beyond vietnam rhetorical analysis

Go top